Deoband school of Homosexuality: Finality of Prophethood & their KUFR

is Deoband a school of Homosexuality OR FIQH? : Finality of Prophethood & their KUFR

After watching Shaikh Asrar Hafizahullah’s pre-debate with an ugly looking Deobhangi, I’ve decided to show people their reality and what corrupt beliefs their elders held. right from their own books.

  • TWO MAIN SCAN PAGES TAKES DIRECTLY FROM THE ORIGINAL BOOK IN URDU ARE GIVEN BELOW:

Short post, regarding deoband’s elders belief of Finality of Prophethood and their belief that the Prophet Muhammad sallallaho aleh wasallam is the not the last prophet and a new one could still come is total bulls##it.

WAIT?! why did I put homosexuality in this post’s title? HAHA! you shall see it in the next upcoming posts In Shaa ALLAH!! don’t worry, i will make sure to post it by my OWN SELF! after the debate with Shaikh Asrar and how badly he crushed the deobhangi(bhangi means gutter/human’s waste cleaner), i shall show you their truth as well.

but it doesnt stop here, their own Deobandis issues fatwas against their OWN elders and this is a good thing, we totally applaud it. *slow clapping*

Read more: http://faizahmadchishti.blogspot.com/2017/11/blog-post_804.html

Moulana Qasim Nanotvi says “A Prophet can even come after Muhammad (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam).If such a prophet comes khatam ul nabuat(Finality Of Prophethood) won’t be effected.

” If we assume that in future there comes any other prophet, this will not make any change in the finality of prophet ( khatmiyat muhammedi)”

(“Tahzeerun Naas”)

Here is scanned page where Qasim Nanotwi stated this belief. Due to this hundereds of scholars of that time and also makka/madina put fatwa of kufr on Qasim nanotwi

So if some body says if new prophet is born after Muhammad (Saw) khatam nabua will not be effected is senseless…. it will be effected & the belief dat it will not be effected is qadiayani belief ….. they also have long long explanation to support it

Nanotvi wrote in same tanzeer un nas

“Prophets are higher /chosen one among their followers( Ummati) only in knowledge. When it comes to good deeds, the ummati( followers) attain the equal status of prophets and some times they go above them ” …

So according to nanotvi shahib ummati can become higher than Prophets ….

Did only Imam Ahmed Raza khan called Nanotwi Kafir for this statement ?

No

Jamat e Islami ( Mawdoodi group) few of the members of the Jamat e Islami group took a passage from the book” TASFIYATUL AQAID” of Mawlana Qasim Nanotvee and sent it to Darul Uloom Deoband, asking them if this constitutes Kufr.

They did not inform that it has been taken from their own” akabir’s” book. So the scholars of Darul uloom deoband did not know that this passage is from Mawlana Qasim Nanotvee’s book.

The Muftis of Darul Uloom took no time for investigation and issued the fatwa of Kufr .

Kindly see the Blue underlined part of the fatwa . It says:

“The person having this type of aqida is kafir. Unless he does tajdeed e iman and tajdeed e nikah , no relationship should be kept with him”.

These Deobandi scholars who issued the fatwa of kufr , never gave any “other interpetation” so as not to make takfir upon the concerned person. They immediately issued the fatwa of kufr , only to know it was on mawalan qasim nanotvee!

These Deobandi scholars who issued the fatwa of kufr , never gave any “other interpetation” so as not to make takfir upon the concerned person. They immediately issued the fatwa of kufr , only to know it was on mawalan qasim nanotvee!

Deobandi own fatwas on such concepts

why do Deobandis blame sunnis when soo many ulemas of past & present have called such concept kafir 

Why Nanotwi said in Tanzeer un nas

” First , the meaning of Khatamun nabeeyen should be well understood. For general population , the meaning of prophet ( sal allahu alaihi wa sallam) being khatamun nabeeyen is that the time of prophet is after other prohets and he is the last prophet.

But people of understanding ( wisdom) have relaised that there is no superiority of being the first or last messenger in itself.

Page 18

Translation

“Even if we assume that during the time of prophet there is some other prophet some where else, this will not make any change in the status of prophet being khatmun nabeyeen”

Can you allow me to assume something about his relative which is not correct? No , he won’t.
But regarding prophet they can assume and write any thing.

Is this belief proved from hadiths or past scholars of Islam ….

Ashraf Ali Thanwi writes:

“When Mawlānā Nanotwi wrote Tahzeerun Naas, nobody in the whole of India supported him, except Mawlānā Abdul Hay.”

( Al ifadatul yaumiya)

deoband scholars on this bidah in belief

nobody in history of islam divided khatam nabuwat into categories as nanotwi did

Shaykh Anwar shah kashmiri al D******i writes

“ This division of prophethood into “ nabuwwat biz dhaat and nabuwwat bil ard is crossing the limit set by Quran ( zyadatee) and is mere following own evil desire ( hawa).

( Khatmaun nabiyeen page 38)

Same Anwar Shah kashmiri al Deobandi calls this division of prophethood as impressible ( NA JAYAZ.

( Aqidatul islam,,page 206)

Same Anwar shah kashmiri al Deobandi says this interepretation of athar of Ibn Abbas (rd) IS AGAINST QURAN and uses the usage” MA LAYTHA LA KA BIH ILMA ( the thing which you are not aware of)

( Faidhul baari, vol 3 page 333)

Mawlana Ameen safadr al Deobandi says

“ if some one says that I accept prophet as khatamun nabeeyen , but my understanding is that prophet can authenticate( with his seal of approval) some one else to be a prophet , even this is kufr”

( tajalliyate safdar, vol 2 page 596)

Mawlana Anwarullah Farooqi (rh) who was the khalifah of Haji Imdadullah Muhajir makkii (rh), established Jamia Niazamiya ,Hyderabad , India. He wrote a book “ Anwar e ahmedi” in which he dealt this “new interpretation “of khatamau nabiyyen given by qasim nanotvee. This book has taqreez by Haji Imdadullah makii (rh) himself.

Haji sahib writes

“This servant has seen this book from beginning to end and found that it contains truth and correct sunni belief”.

__________________

Haji imdadullah maki sahib writes

“This servant has seen this book from beginning to end and found that it contains truth and correct sunni belief”.

This book refuted tadhir al nass and uses comments like” is such a philosophical discussion even found in Quran and Hadith? Did any one from the first three century told this? 
Then from where does this type of biddah comes from…..

Mawlana Farooqui has dealt this topic in detail and has even proved from ilmul kalam that this division of prophethood by Mawlana Nanotvee was baseless and is not accepted in Islam.

Please bookmark our website so you can stay updated with latest blog posts and research based articles. also watch Shaikh asrar vs deobandi debate on youtube

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *